Para las autoridades de las cárceles cubanas, el derecho a la libertad de religión o creencias es solo una herramienta de manipulación

Durante décadas es bien sabido que las condiciones en las cárceles de máxima seguridad de Cuba son terribles. Estas condiciones no han hecho más que empeorar en los últimos años, , pues el país entero está hundido en una crisis económica y de infraestructura, agravada por la escasez de alimentos y medicamentos en toda la isla, aunado a los repetidos fallos de la red eléctrica de la  nación, a veces durante días. 
 
Desde 1989, el gobierno cubano ha negado el acceso al Comité Internacional de la Cruz Roja para supervisar o evaluar las condiciones carcelarias. Los presos se encuentran recluidos en condiciones insalubres, a veces de hacinamiento, en celdas infestadas de mosquitos y chinches. La comida que se les sirve es insípida, plagada de insectos y gusanos, y de bajo valor nutritivo. A pesar de la proliferación de enfermedades, como la tuberculosis, el dengue y los brotes de disentería, en las instalaciones penitenciarias, la atención médica es insuficiente, o incluso nula.

Durante los calurosos y húmedos meses de verano, las temperaturas dentro de las celdas pueden alcanzar niveles peligrosos. Numerosos ex presos políticos han declarado a CSW que el agua a la que tenían acceso,  tanto para beber como para su higiene personal, estaba extremadamente limitada, además de turbia o sucia.  

Continue reading “Para las autoridades de las cárceles cubanas, el derecho a la libertad de religión o creencias es solo una herramienta de manipulación”

How the education system perpetuates religious intolerance in Pakistan, and how it could be a route to change 

‘No one is born hating another person because of the colour of his skin, or his background, or his religion. People must learn to hate.’ 

These oft-quoted words of Nelson Mandela have proven all too true in far too many contexts throughout human history, as indeed they do in a very literal sense in Pakistan today. 

While hatred can be ‘learned’ in many ways – from one’s family, or cultural background, or even from negative experiences with the object of said hatred – in Pakistan the teaching of hatred, specifically religious intolerance, is embedded in various forms into the very fibre of the country’s education system. 

Continue reading “How the education system perpetuates religious intolerance in Pakistan, and how it could be a route to change “

How to tune into freedom of religion or belief during party conference season – and have your say 

The UK is currently in the middle of party conference season, when all the political parties gather to discuss policy ideas and their respective visions for the country.  

The Green Party, Liberal Democrats and Reform have already held theirs. Labour and Conservative conferences remain. 

For those of us committed to defending human rights, and freedom of religion or belief (FoRB) in particular, this season is about more than party gatherings and internal discussions. It is an opportunity to observe how political leaders are shaping policy at home and abroad in real time – and to engage, challenge, and push for FoRB to be central in those debates. 

Continue reading “How to tune into freedom of religion or belief during party conference season – and have your say “

India’s ‘freedom of religion’ laws have nothing to do with preventing forced conversions

On 20 August India’s Uttarakhand state government introduced significant amendments to its controversial anti-conversion law. Building on the original 2018 legislation and an initial round of amendments made in 2022, the Freedom of Religion and Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion (Amendment) Bill, 2025, imposes harsher punishments on a range of offences.

Individuals convicted of using allurement, misrepresentation or fraud to induce conversion now face anywhere from three to ten years in prison and a minimum fine of 50,000 rupees (approximately GBP £420). If the case involves a minor, a woman, a person with a disability, or a member of a Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe, these penalties are increased to five to 14 years in prison and a fine of at least 100,000 rupees (GBP £840).

‘Mass conversions’ and those involving foreign funding are punishable with seven to 14 years imprisonment and a minimum fine of 100,000 rupees, while punishments for cases involving threats, assault, human trafficking, or marriage as a pretext for conversion can extend to 20 years or life imprisonment, along with fines covering the victim’s medical and rehabilitation costs.

Continue reading “India’s ‘freedom of religion’ laws have nothing to do with preventing forced conversions”

Bridging the gap: The importance of finding common ground between religious groups and secular human rights organisations 

Oppressive governments depend, in part, on two things: unity among those who support them and divisions within the communities that do not. One of the greatest challenges in addressing freedom of religion or belief (FoRB) in countries where that right is regularly violated is bridging divisions between different groups within the religious sector, as well as the gap that often exists between the religious sector and secular human rights and other independent civil society organisations. 

Religious groups often occupy a unique position within larger independent civil society. They are networked and organised, to different extents, with members who regularly attend and participate in their activities. They often possess a dedicated physical space, where they are able to hold their activities with minimal outside interference. Some religious groups will run outward focused activities, providing social services. In many cases, religious leaders not only hold a significant decree of influence within their respective community – they may also be perceived as moral adjudicators more widely even by people who do not share their religious beliefs.  

Oppressive regimes are sensitive to the danger posed to them by a socially engaged religious sector and outspoken religious leaders who are willing to work hand in hand with larger civil society in defending civil and political rights. Division, therefore, is deliberately encouraged and stoked, often by intelligence and security agencies, with the goal of neutralising or coopting organised independent civil society, including the religious sector.  

Continue reading “Bridging the gap: The importance of finding common ground between religious groups and secular human rights organisations “